OP-ED: Terror by “lone wolves” adds new danger, as Boston proves

Viewpoint
OP-ED: Terror by “lone wolves” adds new danger, as Boston proves
While still unknown, an increasing wealth of evidence and intelligence information is indicating the two Russian-Chechen immigrant brothers alleged to have bombed the Boston Marathon are from that hard to track group of terrorists known as “lone wolves,” who lack an affiliation with larger terror group or operation.

OP-ED: Terror by

OP-ED: Terror by “lone wolves” adds new danger, as Boston proves

By T.K. Maloy

BEIRUT – While still unknown, an increasing wealth of evidence and intelligence information is indicating the two Russian-Chechen immigrant brothers alleged to have bombed the Boston Marathon are from that hard to track group of terrorists known as “lone wolves,” who lack an affiliation with larger terror group or operation.

From the perspective of this correspondent being an American expat in the Middle East, one can imagine the growing problem faced not only by the United States, but for global targets in many countries, given the increasing frequency of these lone wolf attacks. 

Boston signals not the beginning of this phenomena, but nevertheless is something of a tipping point into a new age where anyone with an ideological chip on their shoulder –and there are many kinds of ideological chips, not just radical Islamists — can download easy-to-construct bomb making instructions off the Net or through social media. And then, if sufficiently motivated, (and psychopathological) inflict great harm on innocent civilians.

Boston signals not the beginning of this phenomena, but nevertheless is something of a tipping point into a new age where anyone with an ideological chip on their shoulder –and there are many kinds of ideological chips, not just radical Islamists — can download easy-to-construct bomb making instructions off the Net or through social media. And then, if sufficiently motivated, (and psychopathological)  inflict great harm on innocent civilians.

A number of experts on the subject note the difficulty in identifying the lone actors before their acts of terrors, largely because they ultimately operate outside of any organized group. Though the usually share an ideology with a larger movement.

Professor Christopher Hewitt, a terrorism expert, recently teaching at Georgetown University Security Studies program notes that such unaffiliated terrorists include a lengthening list of lone actors.

A short list, he said, includes Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh; the Unabomber Ted Kaczynski; Mir Amal Kansi, who assassinated five CIA employees on the roadway entrance to the agency office; Eric Rudolph, Olympic bomber and attacker of an abortion clinic; and James Kopp, the sniper killer of abortion clinic doctor Barnett Slepian.

“Police have to identify the terrorist, catch them, and they have to be able to produce enough evidence to convict: so they have three tasks,” Hewitt said. “In many cases they may identify the suspect, but it takes law enforcement a considerable amount of time to capture the persons, consider the case of Eric Rudolf.”
He noted, “In some cases you get superb witnesses, such as in the case of Eric Rudolf, where he was seen running away from an abortion clinic bombing, and removing a wig, while everyone else was running toward the scene of devastation.”

In line with this, Hewitt notes, is the forensic and eyewitness work that led to the quick identification ofTamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as alleged bombers; with nearby cameras capturing footage of the two men leaving backpacks at the approximate vicinity of the explosion, which was also observed by eyewitnesses.

But, Hewitt adds, what was unusual was the speed in which police were able to turn this into actionable information – albeit brought to an even quicker conclusion by the brothers drawing attention to themselves by a violent carjacking.

“I would also emphasize the extraordinary effort on the part of police and the amount of manpower put immediately on the case,” the sociology professor noted.

What is known so far? And were these two young immigrants “lone wolf” attackers.

Several years prior to the bombing, the FBI received a request from the Federal Russian Security Service to interview Tamerlan Tsarnaev in February of 2011. There was one interview, which yielded no suspicious activity and the FBI filed a report on the questioning three months later. FBI staff asked their Russian opposite numbers for more information of which nothing was ever forthcoming. The Russian then made a similar request of the CIA to check their databases for anything derogatory, nothing showed up. 

However Tamerlan Tsarnaev was put on the US travel watch list — not at the level of the “no fly” list only with caveat that his movements be noted — but by the time Tamerlan had traveled to and from Dagestan for a period of six months, his watch list status had “expired” and his reentry to the United States set off no interest or inquiry.

On April 15, 2013, a deadly bombing of the Boston Marathon takes place, killing three, and injuring more than 200, many requiring amputations and other critical medical care.

The FBI published video photos of the two suspects at 5 p.m. April 18; soon afterward, the two suspects hijacked a vehicle at gunpoint in Cambridge, according to an FBI affidavit issued Monday.
An FBI affidavit released Monday, April 22, alleges that Tamerlan says to the car owner: “Did you hear about the Boston explosion? I did that.”

Police locate the stolen car and the alleged bombers in the Boston suburb of Watertown, where a car chase ensues, and then when cornered a gunfight breaks out.

The older brother is killed, the younger escapes in the car and is later found hiding in a covered boat in Watertown. After another firefight he surrenders and is found to have gunshot wounds to the head, neck, legs and hand.

On Sunday, April 21, the surviving accused bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, states to FBI agents that he and older brother Tamerlan bombed the Boston Marathon because of their radical Islamists views as payback for U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. He also says that he and his brother acted alone.

According to the FBI affidavit accompanying federal charges against the younger Tsarnaev, the video evidence is fairly conclusive. Both men are seen entering Boylston Street near the Boston Marathon finish line at 2:38 p.m. Both men were carrying knapsacks.

Separate video cameras, the affidavit stated, then capture footage of each man placing their knapsacks; Tamerlan at finish line and Dzohkar by the Forum restaurant. Tamerlan leaves the finish line and footage shows him elsewhere in the crowd as the first explosion detonates.”Virtually every head turns to the east (towards the finish line) and stares in that direction in apparent bewilderment and alarm,” the affidavit states.

Meanwhile, Dzhokhar, who is referred to as “Bomber Two,” in the affidavit remains calm. He leaves his knapsack on the ground by the Forum restaurant and walks away. A bomb blows up about 10 seconds later.
The affidavit states that the reviewing agent had observed all the camera footage in the area and “can discern nothing in that location in the period before the explosion that might have caused that explosion, other than Bomber Two’s knapsack.”

Thus far – though the entire case is a sad one – police action after the incident led to the apprehension of both suspects very quickly, with one killed during a subsequent heavy firefight between police and bombing suspects.

Could the bombing have been prevented – this is what intelligence officials are trying to find out.
Hewitt said “Terrorist who operate as lone wolves – if they don’t have a previous record, and are under no surveillance – are virtually impossible to find.”

At issue, is lone wolf or not – one of these young men had come under suspicion, but somehow bluffed the FBI.
The what ifs are hard to contemplate, as had older brother Tamerlan Tsarnaev somehow tripped up and revealed to the Russian Security Service; the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security or the Transportation Security Administration (customs), his evolving intentions to launch an attack – history would be far different.

Sadly, it is not.

Scroll to top
Close